th000000109am09, 52009vUTC01bUTCFri, 09 Jan 2009 09:11:38 +0000 11, 2007...08:46p01

Time for George Alexander to Go

Jump to Comments

For years George Alexander served as the Circuit Governor of the Central Circuit of the United States Polo Association as we watched the level of play slowly erode and important club after important club shut down.
He managed to place himself on committee after committee with no positive discernable results as polo attempted to move forward. He was the chairman of the Arena Polo Committee as we watched its importance erode, and maintained his position as Chairman of the Communications/Publications Committee as the Association continued to subsidize both Polo Magazine and Sidelines to the tune of nearly $200,000 a year.
His impact was finally noticed on the Constitution Committee as he managed to engineer changes that seemed to reinforce the “status quo” of the chain of leadership, and his tenure on the Rules Committee seem to have resulted in us seeing more rule changes during his tenure than there had been in the previous 100 years! Yes, it seems it was George Alexander who might have engineered the game time as chukkers were maneuvered from 7 minutes and 30 seconds back to 7 minutes to 5 minutes and 30 seconds and back to 7 minutes and 30 seconds. This man has too much time on his hands!
Often referred to as “the most negative man in polo”, George Alexander served as the interim Executive Director of the USPA in 1995 before taking the position permanently. When speaking with an applicant for the job (a fact that George seemed unaware of) he was asked how the search was going for a new Executive Director. He responded that it appeared that he was the only person qualified for the job. He stayed in the position for five years, a period that saw the membership of the USPA fall 18%.
His current position as the chairman and ONLY member of the Constitution Committee is unfathomable. How the Association can allow for there to be a single omnipotent member of the Constitution Committee is unthinkable-yet there he sits.
When approached about some concerns Western players had over issues Alexander remarked (while Executive Director) “F#%* ‘em, who needs them anyhow.” This was the Executive Director of the USPA arrogantly dismissing 50% of the Association’s membership!
If that isn’t troubling enough, he has been inserted in the position of Secretary-Treasurer of the Association, or “in line” to the Chairmanship.
This foolishness has to end somewhere, and allowing other members of the Association to step into potential leadership roles is important. I don’t see where George has done anything to train those in his wake. It appears that he is more concerned with orchestrating the actions of the Association, not preparing anyone to take his place when and if he ever leaves.
This is only your Association if you take positive actions, and I believe that this is an important step to take. Your thoughts?

8 Comments

  • Backhander, thank you for putting the spotlight where it belongs. All members should be aware that this person is working the system right now to gain even more power than he already has. Shame on the rest of the so called leadership for rolling over for this man. Your call to arms is very timely but I’m afraid with fall on deaf ears.

    There was a blog on another polo web site asking the USPA for a list of their accomplishments. I would also like to see a list of their goals for 2009 and how they plan to keep polo afloat during these difficult economic times.

  • Once again an important issue has been brought up.
    The last paragraph mentions that it “is only your Association if you take positive actions…”
    Question; will the membership do anything? Does it even care?
    I have mentioned before that the large majority of the membership are members only because the club they play at insists they join in order that they may play there.
    If the membership is apathetic then nothing will change and the ‘leadership’ isn’t going to step up to help. At least it doesn’t appear so.

  • Mr. Alexander is a very intelligent gentleman who faithfully, quietly as well as inexhaustably works like a dog for no monetary compensation whatsoever serving those who lead the Association. He is the go-to-guy when intellectual muscle is required to “get it done”.

    • Well stated, Alberto, but money isn’t always the currency of the day-power and control are. l believe that he is arrogant, controlling and one of the most negative people in polo today. I see his choke hold on the Rules Committee and the Rules Interpretation Committee (both of which he chairs) an exercise in his complete control over the game. The folly of him being the chairman and “sole” member of the Constitution Committee is unconscionable. Ask what he has accomplished during hismany years in the USPA, take a look at the status of polo in America today and know that his “leadership” has a big hand in it. He is positioning himself in line for ascendency to the Chairman’s position, and this WE CANNOT ALLOW. Polo cannot affordto have this continuing level of “leadership” continue.

  • Alberto – While I respect your opinion I would like for you to give the rest of us some additional insite as to his accomplishments while serving the association. It appears that we are in the dark on this matter. Maybe you can enlighten us.

    What is your personal opinion on how an association is supposed to run? Is one faithfull, intelligent, person supposed to have this much power? If so, why?

  • Critical in any association made up of paying members that there is constant input from those members. As a USPA member for many years, I have never felt that my input made ANY difference in ANY way. We are required to join the USPA to play as mentioned above, other than that, there is absolutely no incentive to join. Oh, I forgot, I get my POLO mag, and my rules book. I agree with Backhander…never allow one person to become omnipotent, even if the pay is lousy. Absolute power corrupts..absolutely.

  • The non-staff folks that labor for the USPA do volunteer service for what they unilaterally consider the common good. That is their input. Those who do not contribute their time and effort and do not become involved in the process permit said volunteers to control the process, allow the power to be controlled by those that do the work and possibly even permit the so-called omnipotence. Makes sense.

  • Thank you Alberto. But, you are just like the USPA…you never addressed any of my questions from January 11.


Leave a Reply